As the United Nations gears up for its first-in-a-decade review of Canada’s human rights record, activists opposing a controversial “anti-terrorism” surveillance law are jumping at the chance to plead their case in front of the panel.
Opponents of Bill C-51, which passed the Canadian Parliament last month despite widespread condemnation from citizens and lawmakers, will enumerate their concerns with the law and other so-called “anti-terror” policies at the meeting of the UN Human Rights Committee in Geneva this week.
“We want to ensure the human rights committee is aware of a fairly long list of serious, and we would say worsening, human rights concerns,” Alex Neve, secretary general of Amnesty International Canada (AIC), one of the groups taking part in the review, said on Monday.
As Common Dreams has previously reported, C-51 will amend the Criminal Code to expand the mandate and power of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and allow police to detain and arrest people without charge if they are suspected as threats to national security.
It will also grant more than 100 law enforcement and intelligence agencies access to Canadians’ personal information—including their financial status, medical history, and religious and political beliefs—and require airlines to help prevent alleged suspects from flying overseas, among other measures.
This will be the first time in 10 years that the UN will review Canada’s record under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Canada is one of 168 countries that has signed the covenant—which guarantees, among other things, that no one “shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention” or “be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.”
Click Here: New Zealand rugby store
But C-51 is far from the only concern of the AIC and other human rights groups taking part in the review.
“There’s a bundle of issues related to national security, even before bill C-51 came along,” Neve said.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT